Having received a barrage of criticism over his response to a massive uptick in the number of migrants attempting to enter the UK illegally by crossing the English Channel towards the end of 2018, British Home Secretary Sajid Javid last week attempted to regain control of what he has described as “a major incident” by announcing a new action plan agreed with his French counterpart, Christophe Castaner. The pair said they would jointly invest £6 million ($7.8 million) in new security equipment to help customs officials, coastguard officers and police prevent migrants from making the perilous journey in the first place. More importantly, they revealed that any would-be asylum seekers who successfully make it across the water will now be sent back to France under the terms of the Dublin Regulation.
As if to underline how seriously Javid is now taking the problem, the UK Home Office said a small number of migrants who arrived illegally in Britain by boat at the end of last year were returned to France on the morning the announcement was made. While campaigners on the left will no doubt complain that this new action plan is inhumane and cruel, it is in fact quite the opposite, and will if anything help those who are in genuine need of asylum.
As 2018 drew to a close, the number of migrants attempting to make the crossing from France to the UK in flimsy dinghies rose significantly, reportedly partly on account of the fact that people smuggling gangs had told their customers that doing so will become a lot more difficult once Britain leaves the EU at the end of March. Across the course of the whole year, 539 migrants tried to make their way across the English Channel illegally, with 80% of these attempts being made in the final three months of the year, according to UK Home Office figures.
Although comparative numbers for the previous year have not been made publically available, the surge in attempted crossings towards the end of 2018 suggests that this was indeed the beginning of a major incident that required a swift and decisive response. First and foremost, the English Channel is one of the busiest and most-dangerous waterways on the planet, making it a wonder that no migrants have been known to have lost their lives while attempting to cross it to date. Authorities in France have said they would be surprised if migrants have not died while trying to make their way across the water, unbeknownst to authorities, highlighting how important it was for the UK and French government’s to take decisive and meaningful action.
As has been proved so successfully by Australia, one of the best ways of preventing migrants from risking their lives while attempting to travel across treacherous stretches of water illegally is to make it clear that they will be sent back to where they came from if they are successful in doing so. Once it has been established in migrant communities that this will happen as a matter of course, paying thousands of euros to people smugglers for what is very likely to be an unintended return journey to Britain will likely seem a less desirable course of action. Which leads rather nicely onto the next point.
The majority of migrants caught attempting to cross the English Channel at the end of last year were Iranians. While it is inarguable that Iran’s human rights record leaves plenty to be desired, those fleeing the country are not doing so to escape war. They are seeking to make their way to the UK in search of a better life, and in many cases have the funds needed to pay people smugglers to help them reach their desired destination. These are in the majority of cases economic migrants, not refugees fleeing war, persecution and violence. Even when it comes to the few who might be genuine refugees in need of shelter, one has to ask why they have ended up in France attempting to reach the UK.
Under the Dublin Regulation, refugees are quite rightly required to seek asylum in the first EU country in which they arrive. To be candid, observers could be forgiven for finding it strange that the first priority of some refugees supposedly fleeing innumerable horrors in their countries of origin is to make their way north through various safe European countries in the hope of being smuggled into the UK. Of course every country must take in their fair share of genuine asylum seekers, but this must be done in a fair and manged fashion, which is the whole point of the Dublin Regulation.
As well as discouraging migrants from embarking on the dangerous journey across the English Channel, making it clear that any who do will be sent back will also seriously undermine the business model of people smuggling gangs, who make millions of euros by exploiting the refugees and economic migrants who are desperate to reach the UK. The recent uptick in Channel crossings is said to have seen smuggling gangs use “motherships” to take migrants halfway across the Channel, before dropping them off in small dinghies to make the rest of the journey to the southern English coast by themselves.
For providing this service, smuggling gangs are able to charge their human cargo many thousands of euros per head. People smugglers’ businesses, be they operating across the English Channel or further south across the Mediterranean, are largely based on the premise that once migrants make it to their destination of choice, the government of the country in which they arrive will not send them back. Perhaps if the European Union had adopted a similar action plan to the one unveiled by Javid last week, many of the problems associated with the migrant crisis in Europe, including the rise of the far right, could have been avoided.
How phone fraudsters are scamming people while pretending to be government officials
Law enforcement agencies and anti-fraud bodies across the globe spend a great deal of time and effort attempting to educate members of the public about phone fraud. Despite this, incidents involving consumers being scammed in these types of plots remain relatively high, even though people are routinely warned not to hand over any personal or financial information when they are cold called. In the majority of cases, anybody who deals with their finances online or uses telephone banking services will have come across multiple warnings regarding the potential perils of inadvertently handing over their passwords or agreeing with a cold caller to have money paid into a holding account in the event of an alleged fraud. Consequently, it can sometimes be difficult to have sympathy for people who allow themselves to be conned in these circumstances. It can be a different story however when a fraudster calls up pretending to be from a government agency.
The majority of people will have had at least some experience of dealing with the financial institutions with which they have relationships over the phone, often to the degree that they would be able to tell if something were amiss if they were called by a fraudster pretending to be from any such firm. Conversely, far fewer members of the public are used to routinely dealing with government agencies that might have reason to contact them, and would likely be less than familiar with what to expect from a call from somebody purporting to be a public official. This is a fact that phone fraudsters are able to take full advantage of.
At the beginning of this month, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) revealed that complaints to its Consumer Sentinel Network about government imposter scams reached record levels this spring. The consumer protection agency noted an increase in the number of phone scams that involved fraudsters pretending to be from official agencies such as the Social Security Administration, the Internal Revenue Service or some other government department. In May alone, the FTC said it received around 46,600 complaints relating to this type of fraud, and noted that some victims are being threatened with arrest if they refuse to hand over fictitious back-tax payments. In some cases, fraudsters are using sophisticated “number spoofing” technology that makes it look to victims as though they are calling from official government phone lines. Some scammers are even demanding that victims hand over their payment in the form of gift cards, which the FTC said should be the perfect giveaway that a fraud is taking place.
Meanwhile in the UK, the BBC last week revealed that organised scammers are taking advantage of loopholes in the British government’s new Universal Credit welfare system to profit from plunging jobless people into debt. The fraudsters approach unemployed people while pretending to be government workers and offer to help them apply for welfare benefits. After taking down their personal and banking information, the scammers apply for emergency loans in the names of their victims, taking the money and leaving the benefit claimants they target laden with the subsequent debt. The BBC found that the criminal networks behind the scam are using social media to attract victims, setting up Facebook pages with titles such as Gov Grants Same Day, Same Day Grant, Discretionary Budgeting Grant and Same Day Grant Payment. In a separate scam, fraudsters are contacting UK taxpayers by phone and threatening them with legal action or even jail if they fail to hand over on-the-spot fines of many thousands of pounds.
Chinese nationals are routinely targeted in these types of scams, with organised criminal networks operating illegal call centres in multiple locations around the world dedicated to contacting potential victims who originate from China. In some cases, these gangs have been known to call people they have already targeted in past scams while posing as police officers in order to convince them to hand over more money under the pretence that a payment is required before an investigation into the previous fraud can be launched. Just this week, police in Australia issued a warning about a telephone fraud conspiracy targeting the country’s Chinese community, particularly international students. In several “complex social engineering fraud and telephone scams”, the criminal networks behind these extortion plots call potential victims pretending to be from a range of official agencies. In one particularly sad example of the way phone fraudsters target Chinese nationals, it was reported back in 2016 that a prospective university student from Shandong province had died of a heart attack after she was conned out of her tuition fees. Fraudsters contacted the 18-year-old pretending to be from the “education ministry” and convinced her to transfer the money to a bank account under their control.
In many cases, people who fall victim to scams such as these will stand little chance of getting their money back, leaving them facing significant financial hardship. The sad reality of the matter is though, that while law enforcement agencies do all they can to raise awareness of this type of phone fraud, the scammers who perpetrate it will continue to profit all the while they are able to find vulnerable victims who fear getting into any type of trouble with authority.
Why organised criminal networks are moving into anabolic steroids and other performance enhancing drugs
An extraordinary number of people these days put an inordinate amount of time, money and effort into the way they look. In many cases, it would seem, they do so largely on account of worries over how they might appear to their followers on social media. Evidence suggests that a growing number of these image-obsessed individuals are increasingly turning to anabolic steroids and other cosmetic drugs such as fat-burning pills and tanning injections in order to achieve the appearance they desire, despite the huge amount of harm these substances can cause. Alarmingly, use of anabolic steroids has been rising in countries such as the UK for several years, with one study published in 2018 revealing that a million Britons had taken them solely to enhance their appearance rather than their sporting performance.
Similar patterns have been noted in Australia in recent years, while in the US, it has been reported that steroid abuse has been becoming more of a problem among teenagers. Although often associated with young men who are keen to bulk up, Scottish experts cautioned back in 2017 that middle-aged men were increasingly turning to the drugs in a bid to make themselves look younger, in spite of the potential health risks.
As anabolic steroids are of limited medical use and are typically only available on prescription in most countries, the majority of people who wish to take them must get hold of them illegally, which has led to the illicit trade in such drugs becoming more attractive to organised criminal networks operating in numerous countries. The extent to which crime gangs have become involved in the sports doping market was revealed earlier this week when Europol announced that an operation it led had been responsible for the disruption of 17 organised crime networks involved in the production and trafficking of counterfeit and smuggled medicines such as steroids.
Operation Viribus, which involved law enforcement agencies from 33 countries, resulted in the location and shutdown of nine illicit doping production laboratories, the seizure of almost 24 tonnes of raw steroid powder, and the arrest of 234 suspects. Europol said intelligence gathered during the operation showed that organised criminal networks are shipping huge quantities of steroids into EU member states to cater for growing demand, and that smaller players are ordering shipments of the drugs from countries such as China to sell in gyms.
It is not difficult to see why organised crime groups have seen the illicit trade in steroid-like drugs as a golden opportunity. Aside from the apparent growing popularity of such substances, sports doping laboratories are relatively cheap and easy to set up, while the knowledge required to produce these types of drugs in large quantities can be acquired by almost anybody online, regardless of their knowledge of chemistry. On top of this, the penalties for trafficking or distributing anabolic steroids and similar drugs are lighter in many countries than those for dealing in substances such as cocaine and heroin.
Just weeks before the results of Operation Viribus were made public, Europol revealed that most of the counterfeiting that affects member states is carried out by professional criminal organisations, and that these networks were increasingly producing a wider range of fake medicines, including performance enhancing drugs such as anabolic steroids and doping substances. In several EU countries, law enforcement authorities have recently made more than 20 seizures of 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP), a toxic chemical that is sometimes sold as a so-called “fat burner”. Meanwhile back in October of last year, Interpol said anabolic steroids and slimming pills had been among 500 tonnes of fake medicines it had seized during an operation targeting illicit pharmaceuticals in 116 countries.
Only last month, a man from London was convicted for his role in a £40 million ($49.12 million) steroid smuggling conspiracy that was said to have been the largest of its type ever disrupted globally. Gurjaipal Dhillon, 65, who is due to be sentenced later this month, was found guilty of acting as a fixer for the group by arranging dozens of unlicensed shipments of drugs from India into Europe, where they were eventually sold onto body builders on the black market. With reports of smaller but similar conspiracies emerging in countries such as Canada, the US, Israel and Ireland, evidence suggests that organised criminal gangs have become wise to the large amounts of money that can be made by trafficking these drugs, and the relatively light punishment they might face if they are caught doing so.
With modern culture across the globe becoming more image obsessed, and with people seemingly becoming increasingly willing to go to more extreme lengths to achieve the look they believe they must present to the world, it seems likely that the illicit market for steroids and other performance enhancing drugs will only grow over the short to medium term. This expanding market will inevitably continue to attract the attention of both large and small organised criminal groups, which will happily seek to meet the demand for such substances, regardless of the devastating effect they can have on users’ physical and mental health.
The case of a migrant corpse falling from a Heathrow-bound jet highlights the threat of poor aviation security in developing nations
Air travel security has changed radically since the 9/11 attacks of 2001. In the immediate aftermath of the worst terrorist atrocity the world has seen, governments, airlines and aviation authorities across the globe imposed a range of measures intended to make it less likely that extremists could stage a similar attack in the future. Over the years that have passed, nervous regulators have not hesitated to introduce additional security procedures as and when new threats have emerged, such as a ban on travelling with liquids that was swiftly implemented back in 2006 when UK police uncovered a jihadi plot to blow up a transatlantic flight. While these measures appear to have helped prevent a repeat of anything on the scale of 9/11 over the past 18 years, several recent incidents suggest that aviation security is far from as tight as it could or should be, and that luck may also have played role in the fact that the world has not been subjected to another major aviation terrorist spectacular.
On Sunday afternoon, the frozen corpse of a migrant who had hidden in a Kenya Airways plane’s landing gear fell into a residential garden in south London, narrowly missing a man who was sunbathing. Witnesses said that if the migrant’s body had plummeted to earth just a few seconds later, it might have landed on Clapham Common, where there would have been hundreds of people at the time. While the shocking nature of the incident led to it being widely reported in media across the globe, scarce attention has been paid to how the migrant was able to stowaway on the flight, and the questions this raises about security at Nairobi’s Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, from where the plane departed.
Responding to reports of the migrant’s death, the Kenya Airports Authority, which owns and operates nine civilian airports and airstrips across the country, said it was investigating how the man managed to apparently sneak past customs checks and climb onto the plane before it left for London. On Twitter, the authority said: “We wish to reiterate that safety and security is a priority at our airports and this incident is being treated with the seriousness it deserves.”
The case is the latest of several relatively recent incidents that have highlighted how international aviation security is only as strong as the checks and measures in place at the world’s least secure airports, and how weak spots at these facilities can leave the entire world exposed to major threats. Speaking with the Guardian, aviation expert Philip Baum said the frozen migrant case demonstrates why plane manufactures and airlines should fit heat sensors that can be used to detect stowaways in locations such as aircrafts’ landing gear wells.
But while this would undoubtedly help locate migrants in the event they were able to gain access to a commercial aircraft and hide themselves away undetected, it does nothing to address the fact that it should not be possible for unauthorised individuals to get this far in the first place. If people can bypass airport security and get that close to a plane, heat sensors would be of little use in the event that such a person was able to successfully plant an explosive device.
Alarmingly, the Kenya Airways incident is only the latest in a string of cases in which security at airports in developing nations has been shown to be inadequate. In 2012, a man who was later identified as Mozambique national Jose Matada fell to his death in similar circumstances after stowing away on a plane that had travelled to London from Luanda in Angola. Three years later, the British government banned direct flights to the UK from Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt after a bomb made it past customs inspectors at the resort’s airport and brought down a Russian jet, killing all 224 people on board. Daesh later claimed responsibility for the attack, publishing images of what it said was the explosive device it managed to plant on the doomed aircraft.
In 2016, a planned suicide attack on a flight leaving Mogadishu International Airport in Somalia failed when a laptop in which explosives had been planted blew up prematurely just after the plane had taken off, killing only the suicide attacker. CCTV footage later emerged that was said to show an airport worker handing the laptop to the suicide bomber after he had passed through security checks. The attack was claimed by Somali Islamist group al-Shabaab, suggesting the jihadi organisation may have had an operative working airside at the airport.
While airports in western nations can also be vulnerable to security lapses and infiltration by those with malicious intent, it is hard to ignore the fact that many of the major breaches that have occurred over the course of the past few years have come about as a result of possible failings at installations in developing countries. All of these cases serve to demonstrate that no matter how many additional layers of security are added to the process of taking a commercial flight in the west, it is all but impossible to eliminate the risk that threats made possible by weaknesses in checks and processes at airports in countries such as Egypt, Somalia and Kenya could result in disaster elsewhere.
It is fortunate that nobody on the ground was hurt during the incident in south London on Sunday afternoon, and while it is of course tragic that the migrant who fell from the plane lost his life in such terrible circumstances, attention should now focus on how security failings allowed him to put so many other peoples’ lives in danger.
- Colombian man caught with half kilo of cocaine under wig at Barcelona airport
- Wildlife trade NGO TRAFFIC holds two-day workshop intended to improve animal crime conviction rates across India
- Police in US warn against flushing drugs down toilet through fear of creating ‘meth gators’
- How phone fraudsters are scamming people while pretending to be government officials
- Amazon Prime Day bonanza for counterfeiters as sales of fake items rise by a third over discount event, survey finds
9 February 2018
9 February 2018
8 February 2018
28 November 2017
28 November 2017
Follow us on Twitter
Articles4 weeks ago
Counterfeit and smuggled consumer goods worth $3.5 million seized across Americas and Caribbean
Opinion4 weeks ago
Western nations must ban the ‘transplant tourism’ that is costing Chinese prisoners of conscience their lives
Articles3 weeks ago
China bans meat imports from Canada after discovery of counterfeit pork health certificates
Articles4 weeks ago
European police agencies seize 550 tonnes of counterfeit pesticides in latest edition of Operation Silver Axe
Articles3 weeks ago
Huge Captagon smuggling plot among more than 400 drug trafficking attempts thwarted by Dubai Customs in Q1
Articles3 weeks ago
US Coast Guard seizes over 3.5 tonnes of smuggled garlic from traffickers’ boat in Caribbean
Articles4 weeks ago
Global food fraud crackdown results in seizure of goods worth $117 million and arrest of 672 suspects
Articles2 weeks ago
Jihadi networks using Facebook to trade looted antiquities stolen from war-torn countries, report reveals